Author Archives: Lucas

blacktown art gallery censorship schermozzle

Blacktown Art Gallery recently organised an exhibition entitled [out of gallery] which was billed as a series of "guerrilla art events". However, last week the work of one artist, Zanny Begg, was cancelled and censored by the very council which commissioned it. Here is an account of the schermozzle from Zanny herself:
…………………

What project was the artwork part of?
Was the commissioning body aware of the nature of the artwork before it was installed?

The artwork was part of the [Out of Gallery] project which is jointly organized by the Blacktown Arts Centre and The University of Western Sydney.
This was a curated exhibition: artists were asked to submit a proposal of the work they wanted to make and they were chosen on the basis of their proposals. The commissioning body was, therefore, aware for at least two months prior to its installation of the work that I intended to make.
My proposal read as follows:

"If accepted into this exhibition I would like to construct a site-specific installation and public intervention which expands upon an earlier work of mine called “Checkpoint”. In this work I created a life-size stencil of a US soldier which I placed at various “checkpoints” around Newtown. I created a series of 10 checkpoints for weapons of mass destruction outside churches, schools, houses, bus shelters – to highlight the contradictions in the political rhetoric surrounding the war. I wanted to show how absurd this rhetoric can be – a school accused of being a hiding place for weapons of mass destruction – but also how pertinent – schools in Iraq were destroyed for this very accusation.
I want to expand and develop the Checkpoint series for the Blacktown context by creating 10 checkpoints in locations around the central business area. Some of these will be sprayed onto paper and glued up (as the series in Newtown) and I have chosen a range of hoardings and disused walls for this part of the project. Some I want to spray onto wood and cut out and attach onto fences and poles.
The aim is to place the checkpoints in surprising places to highlight how the conflict in Iraq returns unexpectedly and confronts us as we shop/commute/work."

What happened?

The day began rather uneventfully – the biggest problem I felt that I was going to encounter was the weather with clouds and showers forecast for the next three days. The installation team – Kate Carr, Joy Lai and myself – crammed into a hire ute and headed out to Blacktown expecting that we would be dodging rainstorms all day. The first part of the installation was fantastic. The weather held and in about an hour we had five checkpoints set up along First St and Prince St. Crowds of school kids had been giving us the peace sign and yelling support out of a bus windows and a number of surprised and interested locals had stopped and stared as five life-sized US soldiers appeared in their neighborhood.

We then decided to head over to the Blacktown Arts Centre and set up one checkpoint in the car-park as I had promised the curator. We had set up one checkpoint outside Kmart and were outside the gallery on Flushcombe St when I was approached by a Community Law Enforcement Officer who wanted to know what we were doing. I explained that we were part of the [Out of Gallery] project and were installing a community artwork. He went inside the gallery and to check it out and came back and told us that my artwork was an illegal sign and “in the climate of terrorism” it was “inappropriate to show such political messages”. Confused I called the curator and he told me that the General Manager had called him and that I had been pulled from the show. I was asked to remove all the remaining artworks.

What happens to the artwork now? Do you face some kind of fine?

When I went back to Blacktown the next day four of the artworks had been removed by the council and the Blacktown Arts Centre took the remaining one back to the store room. The council then sent me an email which read:

Ms Begg
Council has impounded the above sign. Enquiries made by Council indicate that you may be owner of the sign.
The sign can be claimed within 28 day of the date of the email.
An impounding fee of 410.30 is payable prior to the sign being returned.
should the sign not be claimed within that time or the impounding fee not be
paid council will proceed to dispose of the sign in accordance with the provisions of the impounding act.

I rang the council and explained that I felt unable to pay a fine to the council for a work which the council (via the art gallery) had commissioned me to make. After a short conversation a representative of the council called me back and said the fee had been waived and the works would be returned to Peter Charuk at The University of Western Sydney.

How do you feel about this whole schermozzle?

I felt very deflated and disappointed when I was pulled from the show.
The curator, Adnan Begic, had organized an interesting exhibition with great artists and I had been very excited to be included within the show. The byline for the [Out of Gallery] project was “guerilla art interventions” in Western Sydney and I had been very upfront about the work I intended to create for such an exhibition. I was disappointed, therefore, when the heat came on and there was some opposition to this work, that I was dropped from the show.

I was also disappointed that in the discussion surrounding the work that an attempt was made to recast the work as a political stunt and not an artwork.

The Mayor of Blacktown, Leo Kelly, issued a statement to the media which alleged that I was a member of a communist organization as if this alone would discredit the work. I find it disappointing that socially engaged art is so maligned. There has been an entire discussion about the “death of the avant guard” impulse in contemporary art. But this incident highlights to me that it is still possible for artists to confront and challenge aspects of society through their work.

But I have been grateful also to those who have offered their support – Stephen Mori, Con Gouriotis, the CFMEU, the local peace groups, the NSW Civil Liberty Group, the Greens, Susan Nori and individual artists who have contacted me and many others.

During all the fuss I remember looking down at a pile of CDS on the floor of a friend’s lounge room and seeing a Public Enemy CD. The song titles “Mind terrorist” “louder than a bomb” and “911 is a joke” caught my eye. Artists have long been interested in power/war/terrorism as subject matter and in the “wake of 9/11” we cannot render these topics “off limits”. We need to be careful that the “war on terrorism” is not used as a silencer for artists dictating what is OK and what is not OK to talk about. We need to be aware that anti-terrorism does not become the new McCarthyism making illegal/unspeakable views and opinions which challenge the status quo.

Is it true that other works which were planned as part of the [out of gallery] programme were cancelled following the censorship of your work?

Yes, as far as i know all the works in Blacktown that were uncomplete were cancelled or moved to another suburb. I think it would be good for other artists in the show to contact Adnan Begic (the curator), he has not responded to any of my emails and it would good to hear his response. Also at this stage the ONLY comment about why i was pulled from the show was by a council ranger, Adnan and the council never actually gave a reason why…
………………………………………………………….

update: the art life blog has much discussion on this particular censorship case, although not all of it is intelligible nor intelligent (but some is!)… I can't work out how to click directly to the article so you have to go to the art life , then proceed to November 29, 2004, and view the comments…

update: as at December 6, 2004, Adnan has not replied to my invitation to respond to Zanny's statements…

update: "Battle over street art" by Lee Dixon published in the Glebe Inner Western Weekly newspaper Thursday 9th December 2004, p 8… Two quotes from the article:

"Blacktown Mayor Leo Kelly said the Out of Gallery exhibition had been suspended until the council investigated why it was not informed of the project. 'If they had gone through the correct procedures and told us what was going to happen, we could have worked with it […] This sort of thing in the name of art is not going to go on in our city'…"
"A council spokeswoman said it would be innapropriate for Mr Begic to comment while council was examining the issue."

update:…email from Zanny:
Call for artists/activists:
make a placard…

On November 23rd 2004 I was asked to remove my artwork from the [out of gallery] project in Blacktown because it was critical of the war in Iraq (see http://bilateral.blog-city.com/ for more info). This is an open call for artists or activists to show their opposition to the war on terrorism and reject any attempts to censor those of us who speak out about political issues.
I am inviting you to be part of an exhibition at Mori Gallery which opens on January 26th. I am asking artists or activists concerned about these issues to donate an artwork which will be available for sale during the exhibition.
The only restriction for the work is that it is mounted on A3 cardboard – like a placard at a rally. Any works sold during the exhibition will raise money to produce a catalogue of the show which will have photos of the placards and essays by artists and activists.
Don’t be silenced by a climate fuelled by war and fear.
The works need to be delivered to Mori Gallery by January 10. Please
email zannybegg2@hotmail.com or morigallery@bigpond.com or call 0421420420 if you would like to participate.

update: "Postwest" publication arrives, contains dodgy data… (Dec 27th 2004)
This week in the mail I received a copy of the "Postwest" publication – basically a catalogue of the [Out of Gallery] projects. There is no mention of the censorship of Zanny Begg's artwork. On page 58, under a photo of her piece installed previously in (presumably) Newtown, there is a statement about the piece, obviously written by the artist herself, followed by this statement:

"Installation of Checkpoint was never realised. The picture above was created by artist who provisionally positioned one of the "checkpoint" plates in her neigborhood [sic] for documentation purposes only."

That this text was not written by the artist is fairly obvious – consider her remarks about the whole censorship affair in the interview above, and it would seem like a radical back-down for her to distill the whole thing to the bland statement that the "installation was never realised". According to Begg, the installation was partially realised before being siezed by council goons. So, strictly speaking, yes, if you wanted to be picky, you could say that the installation, in its entire, intended form, was never realised, but that's being mealy mouthed, given all the shit that went down.
This is another blatant case of re-writing history, all the more duplicitous since the statement is presented as if it were written by Begg herself – tacked on to the end of her artist's statement, rather than being clearly indicated as a statement by the folks putting together the catalogue.
The thing that makes this dodgy addition so obvious to anyone who was involved with the [Out of Gallery] project is the language used in the tacked-on statement – note the lack of definite articles ("Installation" instead of "The installation", "created by artist" instead of "created by the artist" etc) – it seems clear to me that this was written by curator Adnan Begic, whose correspondence is peppered with such linguistic quirks. (see for instance the email update below…)

update: Adnan Begic no longer working for Blacktown Arts Centre. (Dec 21 2004)
I received this email from Adnan, the curator of the project, and I imagine he sent it to all those involved in the [Out of Gallery] programme. No mention of why he is "concluding" his "last contract" – in fact, as far as I knew, he was planning to run the entire "Western Front" exhibition programme in Blacktown mid-2005. Weird eh. So, what I want to know is – did he get the sack over the Zanny censorship schermozzle? Why did he go totally mute and not answer any emails or phone calls over this issue? (I have also since emailed and phoned the new contact details in the email below, without any response!) What does he think about this whole issue? Why did he not come out in support of the artist's freedom of speech? etc

From: "Adnan Begic" <Adnan.Begic@blacktown.nsw.gov.au>
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2004 11:56:02 +1100
Subject: Adnan Begic – WF The end of campaign
Dear friends,
After two and a half years with Blacktown Arts Centre I am concluding my
last contract position as BAC Curator. It has been a good a challenging but
rewarding period for me.
Almost a year ago I have initiated Western Front project. Over the last
twelve months Western Front Campaign has fused a dynamic partnership of
twelve regional and metropolitan art institutions and galleries and has
enabled more then 70 artists to participate in various contemporary art
programs, exhibitions, forums and art initiatives throughout Western Sydney.
Considering these achievements and professional accomplishments I will take
this opportunity to give a credit not only to BAC staff who have worked with
me on a yearlong campaign with great dedication and enthusiasm, but also to
all partners and artists who have made this campaign possible.
Western Front Exhibition 2005 is perceived by the regional artists as a
promising professional opportunity. Sharing their perception, I hope this
vision will be realised some time in the future.
My last day at Blacktown Arts Centre will be Friday 24 December 2004. After
this date please do not hesitate to contact me on 0415 518310 or through
contempo_rare (curatorial agency) contemporare@aol.com.
It has been a pleasure working with you all. I am looking forward to
cooperate with you in the future.
I wish you all Merry Christmas and very productive and prosperous New Year.
Kindest regards.
Adnan Begic

christine hill

"Like many social artists, Hill sees most of her work as both introverted and extroverted. It is in fact a skillful updating of what used to be called 'Life Art'. In an aesthetic echo of the American dream, Hill's work has gone from downscale (street vending, rummage sales) to the pseudo-corporate (board meetings, TV shows, fashion show). Yet it still offers an endearing mixture of Dada, pop, performance, process art, and conceptual art, recycled for the 21st century with a certain fin de siecle élan. Her trajectory provokes insights about the relationship between lifestyle and 'baggage', mobility and status quo, packing and unpacking (postmodern intellectual processes in themselves), the familiar and the foreign, cultural memory and amnesia, as well as the dangers of uncritical service. There's no telling how far she will go in this direction, but as she pushes the envelope, Hill is also pushing the letter. And that can only be good for art. Is Volksboutique a bargain? A gift? A joke on art? In its ambiguity lies its success. I know I'm right because, after all, the customer is always right…"
http://www.volksboutique.org/front_workshop.html

networks a go go!

have been scratching my withered brains for ways to “frame” my project for possible postgraduate study next year. its due in a few days, and it’s been a really difficult process. see, it has to be “cohesive” and “achievable within the time frame”. and a lot of my activities are pretty disparate and scattered. kinda like different hats i wear when collaborating within different groups. over a few rewrites i’m getting closer, i think, to throwing an umbrella over the things i’m into by thinking about “networks”.

it could work, for (at least?) 2 reasons:
-first, the obvious connection is an extension of the network of uncollectable artists, which i helped start up last year, and which (despite the successful launch of our bubblegum cards) is yet to really take off as a “network” per se, at least not to the utopian extent i would like…
-second, it would give me the chance to immerse myself in some heavier reading about networks of all types, to find out how they work, and why, and what to expect of them. it all ties in with the web course that i’m doing at tafe too, of course…

some very funny network links have popped up from googling about…such as this one by Charles Kadushin called A Short Introduction to Social Networks:

“A and B are friends as indicated by the double arrow. C and D are also friends. E, D and F are a clique. F has a special liking for G but it is not certain that G reciprocates. Now imagine that A is a Jew and B is an Arab and d through G are also Arab. All the letters but G are men. G is a young woman with an important father. Other things being equal, what are the odds that A and B will remain friends?”

(you have to see the accompanying diagram to make sense of it!!)

another article i found which makes me feel more optimistic about my potential project is entitled Applied Network Theory by Jon Udell. He writes:

The research suggests a kind of grand unified theory: networks made out of anything (molecules, nerve cells, electrical grids, transportation systems, web links, human beings) obey the same laws of growth and arrive at similar structures. In every kind of network, a few nodes differentiate. They attract more links, become hubs or routers, and radically shorten the distance between arbitrary endpoints.”

Udell goes on to make connections between social networks, blogs, software development and the film industry…

audio tours with Nobody and Yasunao Tone

The following is an email i sent to the ArtRadio e-group* on April 15 2003…

It seems like a long time ago, but my mate Nobody (who did the excellent WeedKiller/PestController project at an abandoned drive in cinema in 2002, together with Maxine Foxxx) was scouring around for projects related to his own…I remembered reading about Japanese artist Yasunao Tone. I thought this post might live well here, on this blog!

…………………………………………………………………………….
Hi all.
Just a note to offer a sketch of an idea I had about five minutes
ago. Or rather, an idea I stole from a Japanese fluxus artist I was
reading about. His name is Yasunao Tone, and in the most recent
Yokohama Triennial (whatever that is) he presented a work called
"Parasite/Noise". Here is a quote about it:

"Functioning as an altered audio guide to the exhibition itself, Parasite/Noise
consists of headsets which ‘play a text read aloud which has nothing to do with
the exhibited works themselves’, thereby creating a disjunction between
what is seen and what is heard, between the ‘meaning’ of the work
witnessed and the heard text. As Tone posits, the work is a ‘pseudo
audio guide’ reasserting such guides as interfaces between audience and
art. Yet for Tone this interface offers the chance to redirect
‘meaning’ by sabotaging the one-to-one equation of what the museum
says and what the art work does. Here the very authorial language of
art institutions is shortcircuited through what Tone calls ‘paramedia’
a kind of parasitic alteration that leads to an altogether different
signification. "

What I like about the piece is that it offers a new form of dialogue
around the venue, the exhibited thing, and the viewer
in a way which is not separate from the time and place that those three
poles converge. This is in contrast to a published article or radio
broadcast which by their very nature ‘stand apart’ from the thing they
are discussing (unless what they are reflexively discussing is that act
itself of reading or listening).

What I reckon could be even more exciting about
Tone’s project would be if it were completely unauthorized and
unsolicited by the institution. From my experience working in the MCA,
the words and texts which emerge parallel to the exhibition (like wall
texts, media releases, catalogues) are all heavily vetted and approved
by various levels of hierarchy, often resulting in atrophied and dull
statements which say only the most predictable things. It’s even
somewhat unheard of to encounter a staff member openly saying that
they didn’t like such and such an exhibition for whatever reason
(except with reference to its public/critical popularity or lack thereof.)

What I was thinking was that we (the artradio
group, or some of us, or others too) might prepare such an unauthorized
audio guide to a big show at the MCA (or wherever else) It would give
us the chance to hone our audio skills in the production of broadcast
quality programmes while still waiting approval to parasite onto one
or another of those radio stations. As to how it could
work, that might be open to the group to evolve whether an individual
was in charge of an individual exhibition tour, or individuals took
on the same show in however many different ways, or some collaborative
way was found to tackle the whole thing.

What do you think?

lucas
…………………………………………………………………………………………..

*
(An e-group we established to try set up an artist's radio programme on radio fbi in sydney – a project which never got off the ground due to (what we regarded as) fbi's precious ideas about programming)

scott snibbe website

just stumbled over the work of scott snibbe who makes marvellous "expanded cinema" type screen interactions. his site has some excellent photos of works …for example:

Compliant creates a projected screen of “soft light”. As visitors walk into the field of the projected screen, the shadows of their bodies cause the screen to be distorted and pushed away, as if the screen were a rubber sheet. The physical bodies of the viewers become the dominant force in the relationship with the screen, distorting it, pushing it out of its alignment, or completely chasing it out of view. Multiple viewers can impose on the screen from all angles and hasten its disappearance. This give-and-take relationship with the screen also evokes cinema more directly, by recalling the slapstick comedy of Charlie Chaplin endlessly chasing his hat in The Tramp.

http://www.snibbe.com/index.html

more “relational aesthetics” links

http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0268/is_8_39/ai_75830815another interview with nicholas bourriaud

http://place.unm.edu/relational_art.htmluniversity of new mexico relational arts programme

http://www.burchfield-penney.org/news/default.asp?prid=927burchfield penney arts centre

http://huminf.uib.no/~jill/jill/txt -a great blog with media/networked art/technology links aplenty

http://www.test.org.uk/archives/000979.htmlgleaning, exchanging and vernacular media essay from test blog

wot i bin up to

have not posted for a while here…

i’ve started a web design course at tafe, so conceivably bilateral will be moving to a better coded, diy home soon.

have also been working towards a comprehensive squatspace website.

also: will post up some writing soon that was published in latest spinach7 mag – about a super project called splint. check out splint’s beautiful website.

in the meantime: watch unco artist andrew harper (witch from tassie) – he has a film up at www.hobartunderground.com – it’s his celluloid curse against the current government.

also: if in Melbourne, go visit Spread of the Empire – by unco artist Forest Keegel at the Melbourne City Square corner of Collins and Swanston Streets. The work will be on display from midday Friday October 8th until 2pm Sunday October 10th
more info is at the Melbourne environmental art website http://ausmag.de/xxx/enviro/
(the website is made with frames (ugg) so you have to click to “programme” and “melbourne city square” and “page 2” to see info about this great project.)
From the press release: “Spread of the Empire refers to the colonisation of Melbourne. White flour was part of the currency used to supposedly purchase the land Melbourne stands on, and will be used to symbolise the white settlement and City grid being stamped onto the land.


ps – get your entries in for the NUCA unco grants due at end Oct – see the blog entry from August 2 2004 for details!!


art and the dole

artanddolewhere artists and centrelink get it on is a great new blog just launched! It provides handy hints about surviving as an artist on the dole in Australia. I think this is a really important issue, and dovetails nicely with the recent Say No to Nothing campaign, which lobbied for increased artists-fees in Australia. The dole is an excellent form of income for artists, yet too often individuals are intimidated or put-off by the beaurocratic hoop-jumping they have to endure to get that fortnightly cheque. However, all that’s needed is some well-placed advice from experienced dolies – and that’s where artanddole steps in. The blog is looking for contributions too. Also worth a look is dole4arts.com

NUCA ANNOUNCES THE 2004 UNCO GRANTS!

NUCA ANNOUNCES THE 2004 UNCO GRANTS!

NUCA [Network of UnCollectable Artists] is a brand new nation-wide affiliation connecting those who gravitate towards ephemeral projects, participatory experiences, illegal art actions, and activities that oddify everyday life.

NUCA’s first big project was the creation of a set of bubblegum collector cards documenting Australia’s 50 Most UnCollectable Artists. Astronomical sales have resulted in a budget surplus, which NUCA is plunging back into the network – NUCA now invites entries for the 2004 UNCO GRANTS!

From a pool of $2000, the 2004 UNCO GRANTS will be awarded to artists proposing worthy UnCollectable projects. So if you need that $0.40 for a box of matches, $2.90 for blutac or $540.30 for having an animal trained, we could help you out!

Send NUCA whatever is most appropriate in explaining your grand idea – jpgs, actual photos, video or film, sketches, blueprints, plans, prototypes, rumours, or illustrative cakes…and as much info as you can about why you need the cash, and a bit of a breakdown as to how its to be put to use.

Email: info@uncollectables.net
Mail: PO BOX 391 Newtown NSW 2042


REMEMBER! ENTRIES CLOSE HALLOWEEN 2004 [OCTOBER 31st]
more info (soon, I hope) at http://www.uncollectables.net

ps also check out The Art Life Blog, which is an often entertaining, mysteriously authored blog reviewing art in Sydney. On Sunday, August 01, 2004 The Art Life wrote about NUCA! [read that post here]

VISUAL ARTISTS say NO TO NOTHING

passing this on from the
Sydney Art Seen Society:
……………………

ECHO ACTION NO. 1
Yo Yo your No No

PUBLIC MEETING please pass on to others
WHEN MONDAY, 26 JULY 2004
WHERE AUSTRALIA COUNCIL (ENTRANCE)
372 Elizabeth Street, Surry Hills
TIME 5:00 to 6:15pm

VISUAL ARTISTS say NO TO NOTHING but YES TO ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
With a Federal election looming, the Sydney Arts Management Advisory
Group (SAMAG) has invited the Federal Minister for the Arts, Shadow
Minister for the Arts and Arts spokespeople from the Australian
Democrats and The Greens to debate arts policy.

They will speak on how they see the future of the arts and what
policies they have to support and enrich the arts industry.

This meeting will be on Monday, 26 July 2004 at the Australia Council.

Please come along and greet the Feds to let them know what matters to
visual artists:
PROPER ACKNOWLEDGEMENT.
Yo yos will be supplied or bring your own.

This, our first echo action, is part of the VISUAL ARTISTS say NO TO
NOTHING national campaign (26 July – 30 August) that will carry the
STARVING VISUAL ARTIST “put the cliche’ to rest“ PETITION to
Canberra.
Please come along and Yo Yo your No No to the Feds and join us for a
cup of thermos coffee. At least come along and sign our petition.*

* A petition will be present that calls for a standard artists’ fee
of no less than $2,000 per individual exhibition and a pro rata payment no
less than $500 for group exhibitions to be adopted by all publicly
funded, visual art institutions, nationally.

FOR MORE INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT CO-CONVENERS OF THE SYDNEY ART SEEN
SOCIETY
GAIL HASTINGS AND LISA KELLY AT sydneyartseen@yahoo.com.au