Author Archives: Lucas

Ken Bolton on Bilateral

[The following review of my show BILATERAL, by Ken Bolton, is from PLANET_EAF, http://www.eaf.asn.au/nlet/nlet111202.pdf, the Experimental Art Foundation’s online version of its newsletter, Oct-Dec 2002]

SEEING (KEN BOLTON)

25 October to 16 November : LUCAS IHLEIN Bilateral

Sydney-based artist Lucas Ihlein’s stay at the Experimental art Foundation took the forms of an exhibition, a residency (effectively a ‘live-in’ exhibition), numerous outreach extensions of the show-and-project, and special events that took place simultaneously in different registers: the purely social, the social conceived and judged as exchange and reciprocity, and as a system viewed as or by ‘Art’.

As an exhibition Bilateral took the form of installation: much of the installation was made up of works produced (as installation in some cases) for previous incarnations of the project: installations in Singapore, Hong Kong and Perth. Many of the works recorded the experience of those places – the learning processes involved in adapting to them, the frameworks of thought they gave rise to – from preconception, prejudice, cliché, through to a measure of understanding.

An effect of Bilateral, then, was to foreground these things in general terms as well as specific – and to promote a degree of selfconsciousness about one’s own behaviour or about one’s city’s attitudes and the degree of sophistication, tolerance, complacency or ignorance this might evince. The viewing of (the) art was also cast as an experience much less neutral than the gallery cube normally implies. That is, the viewer’s presence relevantly carried signifiers of social class and caste (as it always does, but not usually to the art’s point); the art itself (inviting viewer participation, with the artist present, mediating the experience to a degree) was very much a social situation, with unstated social obligations and codes in place.

Ihlein produced a 3 colour silkscreened poster catalogue/invitation for the exhibition and produced new work in response to the live-in experience at the EAF and in response to Adelaide. Associated events included a film night (‘Film’ Films? Fine!) that, as well as the films, involved the staging of a Fluxus performance event, Albert M Fine’s Piece for Fluxorchestra and Ihlein’s Event For Touristic Sites – a kind of ‘action’. At this last volunteers (and people who joined in on the spot) wore T-shirts at a public tourist site (and on the occasion of the annual Adelaide Xmas Pageant) baldly proclaiming the truth of national stereotypes (All Australians are arse-lickers, All Germans are efficient, All Mexicans are loco, All Taiwanese are shifty sort of thing). Naturally, collected like this, they rendered the very formula ridiculous.

early unCollectable notes…

My friend Sussi recommended the dutch artist group “de greuzen”… they look great, check out their website.

people might wish to get involved with a fictional project i have thrown out into the ether. its a response to that ghastly magazine called the “australian art collector” and their “50 most collectable artists”…
here is the press release:

A dynamic network of artists from around the country will soon be launching their new DIY magazine The Australian Art Eclector. Each issue of The Eclector will incorporate an exciting feature on “Australia’s 50 Most Un-Collectable Artists”.

Phil T. Luca, magazine editor and spokesperson for the Network of Un-Collectable Artists (or N.U.C.A.) explains:

“The compendium of “Australia’s 50 Most Un-Collectable Artists” will be an important resource, especially for those wishing to look beyond the pseudo-official canon of Australian artists who have been vetted and rubberstamped by our short-sighted and commodity-oriented art institutions.”

The group obsessively documents the occurrance of ephemeral artworks, such as Weed-Killer/Pest Controller by Diego Bonetto and Emma Jay, where the artists created an informative audio tour of the various weeds on a run-down Drive-In Theatre site in western Sydney. Another project to make it into the top 50 was SquatSpace’s SquatFest, an anti-TropFest screening of film and video by independent artists and activists. The screenings were held in an abandoned brickworks in inner Sydney. Similarly, the artists of Hotel 6151 in Perth occupied a condemned 1970s hotel, with temporary installations and performances on every floor. The hotel was demolished shortly after.

Other works to make the cut were unwieldy installations, more subtle projects based around exchange and communication, and illegal activities such as billboard alterations.

For more information contact N.U.C.A. at info@uncollectables.net

at the moment it exists as an idea. but i envisage that the NUCA will emerge as a network as an end in itself. i would be happy with that…

drapery service and coffee service

some rough notes, thinking about expanded cinema, Bourriaud, Museums etc…

Sussi suggested doing expanded cinema stuff at the kelleberrin cinema …. i had heard about domenico’s cinema in that town, thought it was a marvellous purchase. so i would definitely be into doing something out there. i reckon the locals would be into expanded cinema, i think, being “movies”, it might transcend the “wanky” conceptualism of its contemporary productions in art.
Continue reading

Performance Space Flier Schermozzle

[the following was first published in The Lives of the Artists (sometime in early 2003) edited by Liz Pulie, Sydney. You can order a copy of the magazine by emailing frontroom_gallery@yahoo.com.au ]

Dear Liz

just wanted to let your readers know about a “schermozzle” that happened with the Performance Space late last year. You might have seen the A3 posters which advertise upcoming events at the space. The design is by Suzanne Boccalatte, and during 2002, the front of the poster always featured two groovy looking people, in their coolest clothes, posing in a grungy inner-city location … its an Aussie re-take on the “Fruits” concept – the Japanese fashion photography book. (The “Fruits” exhibition is actually in Sydney at the Powerhouse Museum right now).

Anyway, in October, Fiona Winning at The Performance Space gave Mickie Quick a ring. Apparently, the two “models” they had lined up to do the shoot fell through at the last minute, and so they were asking me and Mick to pose. We fell about laughing, ‘cos we felt about as far away from that fashion stuff as possible. We agreed to do it anyhow, fascinated and perplexed as to why they had actually asked us … apparently they liked Mickie Quick’s “Refugee Island” street sign alteration which had popped up during the BorderPanic conference, so they were keen to have that in the photo too.

We showed up for the shoot with the Refugee Island sign, and two t-shirts from an ongoing project of mine entitled “Event for Touristic Sites” – t-shirts emblazoned with national stereotypes, in this case “All Australians are Arse-Lickers” and “All Iraqis are Guilty”. We dressed up as daggy as we could, tourist shorts with heaps of cargo pockets, long socks, backpacks, green-n-gold umbrella. Frankly, we were hoping to use the Performance Space poster as a way to place art and politics in the same sphere, and (of course) to promote our own projects via the path of parasitical publicity. (And ok, we admit it, to intervene weirdly in the Performance Space’s “too-cool for school” fashion photo series.)

The photo shoot took place in Redfern: in some side streets out the back of the Performance Space; a funny little concrete apartment block courtyard; and on the traffic island near Space 3 at the corner of Regent and Cleveland Streets. This last location meant that the photo had the racist t-shirts and the Refugee Island sign in the foreground, juxtaposed with the Redfern’s TNT “twin towers” in the background. Suzanne, and Mikala from the Performance Space anticipated that these images might be a bit controversial, so they took a few extra shots in which Mick and I wore our backpacks back-to-front, and with the umbrella pointed to the camera – so that the text on the t-shirts could not be seen … a safety net in case the more hard-hitting images got rejected…

A week after posing for those photos, the “Bali Bombing” happened, and the Performance Space had to call an emergency meeting of its Board of Directors to decide if they could go ahead with using the images from our photo shoot for their publicity poster. You guessed it, they decided that they could only use the watered-down shots with the text on the t-shirts covered up.

Mick and I protested (although without much hope of making them change their mind). First we said that the references to Australia and Iraq on the t-shirts were quite un-related to the specific events in Bali (the Board’s fear supposedly being that their publicity campaign would be read by poster viewers as a direct comment on the Bali situation.)

Then we thought that to go ahead with the image might, in fact, be a courageous (and timely) tactic that the Performance Space could take, by deliberately juxtaposing national stereotypes, tourism, terrorism and refugees. Fiona Winning, the Performance Space’s director, was very supportive of our position. While disagreeing with the Board’s decision herself, she wrote:

“It was the weekend events in Bali which provoked a different position (if only we’d got it to the printers last week!). We talked it through and it’s clear to me, that the weekend events and the image are not related (ie. terrorism and the intensification of anti Muslim fervor) but as they pointed out we don’t have the opportunity to talk through with the viewers of 10,000 posters that are essentially a publicity tool for our program.”

and

“Also there was a feeling that the composition was not careful enough…. (which is Suzanne’s deliberate aesthetic) The twin TNT towers in the back kind of bagging the idea that we are vulnerable to terrorism […] Interesting how much semiotic scrutiny this image came under. Which should not surprise me in some ways and I admit to a level of naivety about not having expected that.”

(One wonders whether the board went as far as humming the words to the old AC/DC song “T-N-T… it’s DYNAMITE!!” as they were debating the semiotics of the shots…)

We respectfully withdrew our consent for them to use the watered down photos, a move Fiona had been expecting anyway. So we left it at that, and the Performance Space organised to re-shoot the poster with new models: two groovy looking kids on a bright yellow motor scooter.

*****

[I contacted the PVI (performance, video, installation) Collective in Perth, having heard that their “Terrorist Training School” project planned for October 2002 had been similarly canned due to the Bali Bombing. Actually, it was only postponed, but the story is similar, and I thought it was fascinating that these two events happened simultaneously on opposite sides of the country… Below is an email reply to my enquiries, from PVI’s Kelli McLusky …]

*****

hey luca

yeah know of your t-shirt project! [wonderful pieces] – we were part of the tis exhibition in perth too, so got to check out some of them there, although missed the public happenings with them.

but, sure, of course happy to talk about the situation and have attached a presser & pics of the work to give you an idea [theres also a write up in this month’s realtime mag, if you wanted more info], but basically the situation goes like this……deep breath…..

the artrage festival commissioned a piece from pvi for the 2002 festival planned for sept 2002. the piece was originally called terrorist training school [yep, nice and subtle] and involved a long period of research into the history of terrorism and its relationship with the media – the company is a core group of six so we get to cover a lot of diverse ground when we get stuck in to a new work. for example, two performers infiltrated the ranks of the local army reserve to gather info on the mindset of a soldier, another joined a terrorism and the media class, we recorded most sight seeing tours around the city – i guess what i’m getting at is that we’re keen for the work to be well grounded before we start to devise. anyway, we wanted the work to be a bus tour around the city, visiting local hotspots and for interventionalist acts to be happening outside at these spaces during the tour. we organised a 22-seater bus, we kitted it out with on-board media [tv, sound, mic and pvi ‘tour guide’] and we started to develop a piece that seemed v focused on generating a growing sense of fear and unease within a familiar surrounding – we mixed factual info on sites such as the belltower with complete fiction, always comparing with american counter-parts, so the belltower became perth equivalent of the statue of liberty, known as perths penis and taking the contemporary design of a cockroach mounting a syringe…you get the idea – ended up a v abstract piece in the end…anyway i’m waffling..our original publicity showed four member of pvi on a local bus with ex-american presidents masks, we used a caption from a seminal book called ‘terrorism’ written in the 70’s which was:

“terrorists will always have to be innovative…they are in some respects the super-entertainers of our time”

initially we received good responses from the publicity.

one week prior to opening the show the bali bombing occurred. artrage started to receive an increasing number of calls stating that the work was in ‘bad taste’ and should be removed from the program – we provided artrage with info on the work stating that it was v much anti-war, but using the structural device of satire in the work. the viewers and listeners association began lobbying the arts minister to have the work banned. one of artrage’s sponsors [the west australian paper] requested that their logo be removed from anything associated with the work [after they had two days prior to bali proudly published the tts ex-presidents image in the arts section of the paper, but actually refused to print the name of the show alongside it, as far as i’m aware]. things got worse with the phone calls as artrage staff members were now in tears from relatives of bali victims phoning up and abusing them for supporting the work [we fielded a few ourselves and also received some prank calls], mostly people were offended by the publicity and the quote about ‘super-entertainment’

artrage called us in for a meeting to see what we wanted to do about it all and they then received a phone call from the arts minister ‘requesting’ that we ‘strongly consider’ postponing or removing the work from the program out of respect for those who had lost loved ones. i have to add at this point that artrage were totally with us and willing to stand behind any decision we made, but we were acutely aware that we were making their life really unpleasant and felt v guilty about that. also anything we seemed to say in retaliation was coming across as defensive, so it seemed to us that we would do more harm to the work by putting it on at this point. we got advice but basically had 45 mins to make a decision before the minister released a statement to the press about it. we were advised to contribute to this statement as it could help to ease the situation, we were also advised at this point that if we wanted to still show the work then the minister could be put in a situation where she have to raise it in parliament in response to pressure from lobby groups – we were worried the work may get banned at this point, which seemed ridiculous as nobody had seen the bloody thing yet! [we were later informed that you cannot ban a work without it having at least one public showing]. anyway our decision after two hours in the artrage office and advice from board members and friends was to postpone and re-mount at a later date.

which we did.

the final work wasn’t at all different in form or content from the original, the only differences being we abbreviated the title to tts, were able to bring the sound artist over to work on-site on the soundscapes and hired a bouncer to ride with us on the bus in order to ensure the safety of bus passengers.

it was a huge learning curve for us, we have had problems b4 with previous work – we did a car sticker campaign once on how to steal the three most popular cars in australia and did a weekend hit on all these cars placing stickers with step-by-step guides on how to carry it out, [what tools to use, preferred clothing etc…] and had a visit from police, fingerprints on file etc.. but in terms of being prepared on how to respond when the shit hits the fan and also the negative impact of publicity and the fact that no-one [i’m talking press] seemed to want to hear our side of the story at all, was a real eye opener. we now want to take tts to every australian city and are in the process of applying for funding to do exactly that – so fingers crossed eh!

sorry its been a long one, hope its not a rant, but that was the upshot of events from our perspective. The deal with the perf space sounds a great shame. We know fiona does a bloody fantastic job and that must’ve been a really difficult call. been chatting to steve [from pvi] about this and you have to wonder if your publicity had gone ahead a week earlier [as fiona mentioned] if you guys would’ve experienced a similar situation to us, our feeling is yes, we think you probably would. it was equally as provocative, if not more so with the direct reference to iraq. my gut feeling now, looking at the image that did come out on the perf space program is that I would like to have seen that original image and make my own mind up about it, not to have board members do that for me. this is an easy stance to take though, we have had people saying to us that we still should have put tts on at the time and in postponing it, it made us seem to be buckling under external pressure, but ultimately for us it was about trying to reclaim some control over the situation and the work – to stop, evaluate, strategise and come back prepared for it as best we could.

take care and look forward to hearing back from you soon 🙂

cheers!
k

[see also www.pvicollective.com and http://www.realtimearts.net/rt53/khan.html]

Nicolas Bourriaud

wow have just started reading a conversation with nicholas bourriaud and karen moss… here’s an extract:

NB: Avant gardes were about utopias. How is it possible to transform the world from scratch and rebuild a society which would be totally different. I think that is totally impossible and what artists are trying to do now is to create micro-utopias, neighborhood utopias, like talking to your neighbor, just what’s happening when you shake hands with somebody. This is all super political when you think about it. That’s micro-politics.

Stretcher: It’s very demanding of the artist.

NB: What’s an artwork? Any artwork materializes a relation to the world; if you see a Vermeer or a Mondrian, it’s concretized, materialized, visible in relation to the world that they had. You can decode and interpret for yourself and use it for your own life. Or for your work if you’re an artist. It’s a chain of relations. History of art is about that — a chain of relations to the world. So, any artwork is a relation to the world made visible.

Stretcher: About this new relationship between the artist and their audience, Christine Hill, one of the artists in TOUCH, said the other night. “I really wanted to be there to hear what my audience had to say.” I know so many artists who are working in their studios who feel that after they put their work out there they’re completely removed from it. They never hear anything back. It’s as if you throw it into the void ….

KM: It’s true for curators as well. You do have a certain voyeuristic opportunity when you are in a space and you can watch spectators viewing the work, or you receive response back if there’s a publication. But often you don’t get feedback. That’s why having the artist present [Ed. note: three of the artists in TOUCH spent time in the gallery as part of their work] is so intriguing. It’s not an artist shipping a work, you have people actually here. This was also true with some other exhibitions I’ve personally been involved with like In the Spirit of Fluxus at the Walker. Or the John Cage exhibition at MOCA in LA. The live action becomes really important to the beginning of the exhibition. It is also interesting how few of the artists in this exhibition are involved with technology. While their work may somehow comment on the technological, they are not much involved with technology, which is refreshing.

…so interesting, its amazing to find people who think in the same ways…what he is saying about technology, about Post-Production, is so what i am into at the moment.

Last year at the EAF, among other activities, I dug up an old score for a performance by Albert M Fine called “Piece for Fluxorchestra”. Each participant (there are 24) has a card with his/her score, a set of numbers from 1 to 15 down the left hand side of the card. these numbers refer to the passing of minutes. maybe on your card there is nothing listed until minute 4, when you have to stand up, declare loudly “i cant take it any more!” and storm out of the room. and so on. there is plenty of muttering, balloon popping, theorising and local referencing. nobody in the room knows anything about what anybody else has to do. each just takes care of his/her own role. in sum, the piece is like a big, rambunctious orchestra of chaos. hilarious. he wrote it in 1967.

the next “re-contextualisations” i am thinking of doing are from “expanded cinema”, a “movement” from early 1970s in london (and vienna too), where filmmakers began to think about the ways that their pieces were presented in space, not just experimenting with the content of the film. there were cool things like billows of smoke in the cinema to illuminate the cone of light, physical presence of performers, spaces set up in a particular way. kind of a pre-decessor of video-installation stuff., but hardly anyone knows of it. hopefully later in the year i will get to london to do some reseach, then bring a programme of this stuff out here mid next year, also to perth (peter mudie obviously very supportive). the important thing for me is that the films come with sets of instructions about how to “re-stage” them, specific, but always relying on the local resources and enthusiasts to bring it off…there is stuff in this project to do with technology, sure, and its partly about going back to that obselete tech and checking out how you dont need all this whizz bang digital shit, in fact, much of what is happening today is a kinda techno-fetishism,,,the “relational” part of “relational aesthetics” is fairly impoverished…

first thoughts to Sussi re residency

(see http://www.pica.org.au/art03/Residencies03.html for Sussi’s clog residency project at perth institute of contemporary arts)

the following is a chunk from an email i sent to Sussi Porsborg:

…regarding praxis and alienation, its certainly easy to feel alienated when at (the wrong) uni…while i did have a good experience at uwa, and remain friends with many of the lecturers there, it wasnt until some time after leaving that i found my real reference points and artistic predecessors…seems like the folks at uwa either didnt think to mention fluxus to me, or they just plain didnt know of it. there are some pieces i did while at uwa which, unknowingly, almost entirely replicate performances i since discovered were carried out in 1965…and so on…
Continue reading

Artist Run Galleries Dialogue

[the following exchange was published as a pamphlet to be handed out to guests at the ArtPort Artist-Run-Galleries Fundraising Auction, in June 2003, at NewSpace Gallery, in Sydney. For further examination of the nature of artist-run-galleries in Sydney, see Simon Barney and Marg Roberts writing in Artspective ps, since Barney/Roberts dialogue is no longer published at Artspective, I have taken the liberty to republish it here on Bilateral Blog.]

Dear Lucas,

the preoccupation that artist-run-galleries have with documenting unremarkable utilitarian matters (such as basic housekeeping), is far from a revolutionary vision synthesised as “manifesto”.

Certainly these mundane issues have continued to dominate discussions through the seminars and catalogue essays introducing the various surveys of artist-run-spaces. The fact is, we generally think of a “fixed and rented space” as the only possible mode of operation. This lack of imagination limits our ability to recognise innovative, radical models.

what do you reckon?

Ruark

……………………………………………

You know, Ruark,

I reckon a big problem comes about with the use of the word “art”. It’s prickly, because there are so many of us who simultaneously embrace and reject what that word has come to stand for.

If you contrast “art” with some other “major genres”, like “theatre”, the distinction becomes clearer. “Theatre”, at least in Australia, has a very specific meaning, and anything that pushes at the edges of the conventional theatre experience (whether that means its “proscenium arch” architectural setting, or the narrative format of its script-writing) ends up outside of “theatre”, such as what is these days often called “performance”. This leaves two somewhat distinct fields, one which repeats and perfects set forms, and one which plays with new ways of communicating.

The term “art”, on the other hand, has always been very catholic in its ability to embrace different definitions of itself. Hence it becomes ever fatter and increasingly inclusive, and this insatiable desire to “include” has extended to the programmes of the contemporary museum itself – the more “non-art-looking”, the better, even if the work is supposed to be a “critique” of the art institution or exhibition space itself.

Of course, in many ways this is a wonderful development, because it means that the pillars of art funding and display have not shrivelled away into backward-looking, genre-specific definitions of what art is. (They are, to a certain extent, simply being pragmatic. If they didn’t embrace the changing “look” of art, they would become extinct.) It’s great that the computer game “Escape from Woomera” could be financed by an arm of the same government that set up the refugee camps themselves.

On the other hand, what this inclusiveness HAS meant, is that the one constant, unwavering characteristic of contemporary art, in all its unrecognisable polymorphy, is the space that, one way or another, it eventually finds itself inside – i.e., a whitewashed, “neutral”, modernist museum/gallery room.

And most “artist-run-galleries/organisations/initiatives”, for some reason, slavishly follow this model. The main practical problem with this is not the flawed concept of “neutrality” (although in a land still resonating from the catastrophes of the “terra nullius” concept, this is actually a major moral issue). No, the main problem with the “mini-museum” model is that it’s too expensive, at least in a city like Sydney, to sustain anything vaguely interesting on a regular basis.

The reason for this is simple – the artist-run galleries have to pay their rent, and they charge out the space to artists for as much as $400 a week. Because this is a significant slug to any artist (on top of their own ongoing accommodation / studio costs, and the fact that they often will have to take a week off paid employment to set up the show), spaces that operate on this model don’t exactly have interesting artists breaking down the doors to get a show. Let’s face it, the galleries take what they can get. Which means that the proportion of shows of any substance are very low indeed. What they do get, very often, are artists who are prepared to make a financial investment in their own careers, by paying for a slot in what is essentially an expensive photographic studio. Hopefully the slides they shoot will get them a grant, and they can shuffle up the rungs a little, inching towards the museum or commercial gallery gig they so crave.

Which is fine. There are always different worlds to participate in, especially in a city as diverse as Sydney. Worlds which offer other models of collectivity, exchange and communication. Projects like Simon Barney’s Briefcase Gallery (where the “exhibition” takes place, one night only, in a pub) recognise that “getting together to chat” is what its all about, and that can be done for free. Or the budding ArtRadio collective, which is working towards an artist run audio “space” on a local community radio station’s airwaves. Similarly, the new Sydney Moving Image Coalition takes the traditional “co-operative” model, the emphasis being on the meetings and collaborations between the members of the group, with screenings taking place in various locations. And in the early 1990s, a group called Art Hotline held weekly events in different places around Sydney, linked by a freecall phone number.

Each of the models offered by these artist-organisations (and there are plenty more) requires “real-estate” of some sort to achieve their aims. However, they use space as a resource, something which helps them, rather than clinging to it, and constantly feeding it like some kind of ravenous resource-gobbling monster.

What do you think?

Lucas

………………………………………..

Well Lucas

I have friends who don’t believe in voting. Bill Lucas the Utopian didn’t believe in art, and said the best architecture is no architecture(maybe he meant Noh!). Some years ago I gave an artists talk at the University of Western Sydney, in a wonderfully theatrical lecture theatre. I grew bored out there so far from the audience. I wanted to leave the lecturn, even for just a minute say and wonder around, not saying anything. Then I began talking about our group called Artists Against Art. I was sure the audience had grown bored with me, and me with them. So my rave about AAA came as no surprise. In fact we started AAA one warm afternoon in Adelaide, on the cafe terrace on top of the State Library. The anthropologist Phillip Jones and I were lamenting how ridiculous the Aaar group was. How flawed good sentiment could be, that the artists against racism had to identify nationalistically, rather than accepting there being a world resonance that went far beyong traditional boundaries that issue race and colour. Actually, that isn’t entirely true.

The painter Margaret Olley use to make her way up to Oxford Street to do a spot of shopping. Very courageous was Margaret with walking frame inching along, and we’d say hello – two wounded souls on the same road. One day she boasted that she’d got an AA. Oh! I was very happy for her, an AA I chimed in again, and she repeated it proudly. So I said I heard she was once a very heavy drinker and I was glad she was strong enough to kick the habit. She looked at me curiously, realising her mistake. When she got a honorary Doctorate, she again charmed me with the news, another day same path – I asked, “Do you feel confident enough to start treating me?” We laughed, and she said we don’t really know what we’re talking about. Talking at crossed purposes is what it was.

So… do Artist-Run-Initiatives know what they’re talking about, yuk yuk yuk! They are too often entrepreneurial exercises. At least here in Sydney that’s what they are. In places like Wagga and Alice Springs, or up at Tiwi for instance, the independence is innovative and adaptable – could be said they are custom built to deal with local problems of decimation. So groups in regional areas are actually critical, whereas in places like Sydney and Melbourne, as enterprises, “spaces” (don’t you hate that word?) are critical only in a “virtual” way – and that is the state of play at present.

I welcome the notion of ArtRadio as you have put it. That alternative surface for publishing on, which renders the structure open for renegotiation, and that, perhaps is where a hybrid model such as Simon’s Briefcase emerges. I like to think that www.haikureview.net has that capacity to “voice free voice”.

Off for now
Ruark

residency

i saw a review of barb bolt’s show in the eyeline mag… for me, the best thing about it was that they included a colour reproduction, SO important, it would have been useless in BW! looked like the writer’s text was edited down drastically or something…it seemed a little disjointed in its explanation of the “technosublime”…perhaps she felt intimidated by the thoroughness of barb’s own writing about her work (barb DID do a whole thesis on it), and felt she had to try to re-present that…
Continue reading

Tim Hilton at SquatFest 2001

[written by Heath O’Brien]

got to tha broadway squats just on dark..stumbled out
of carolines white/sunroofed/roofracked beamer(BMW)- not very pc
for a squatfest i realise however we were pumping japanese 80’s pop.
so, immediately i lose my new goggles…thats ok cos
the lovely michaelscaviellero of imperial slacks spots me & we
meet/greet etc. we knab a skanky futon practically under the
‘bigscreen’ in front of the ballistic speakers & kick back as the first vids
begin…..i ask him if he’s seen u…..who?…he tells me he has
a couple of flicks showing….so does hilton i reply.
about 3 shortfilums later, a lone flyingfox swoops
overhead, and a subtle instantly recognisable beat ..or is it a
clap or pulse…nailsmy attention to the silverscreen.
everyone is silent, basking in the hypnotic rhythym
and pusating gorgeous ‘music{}response’sorial psalm.
now eveyone is intensely aware of the experiance,
there is an electric sense of expectation and a palpable curiousity in the
air mingled with an uncanny familiarity as if we are immersed in a
primeval collective memory.
tension uncannily mounts.
i check the audience – rivetted!
people love it but dont know why!
they want more yet cant take much longer…there is a
whimper from some pleb chik, a question? a moan?
the film peaks—the crowd, silent almost reverent
till now applaud as one.
relieved admiration and a sense of true wonder as we
marvel @ the elegance of your little flic.
the final 20 seconds were genuinely gruelling however
addictve / intoxicating…
imperial slacks calls it “mesmerising”
well received by all .. great interest evident..big
kudos claps

the sound was sensational…..so loud were i was
almost distorted so beautifully juxtaposed on the pinkneon visual yet
remarkably concordant.

an eager voice calls for identity, who was that auteur ?!

“yay…yay timhilton !” i give ’em the goods… she
recognises you so i give her my email 2 contact u…..some
artnetworkcontact.

all in all a true highlight … exploit the medium harness!
do us a favour.
ta
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

for more on Tim Hilton go here and here